An DC, Joo JH, Kim TS, Lee WI. The structural relationships between perceived value of environment-friendly car, product attitude purchase intention and the moderating role of environmental involvement. Journal of Product Research 33: 147-157. 2015.
Araña JE, León CJ. The role of environmental management in consumers preferences for corporate social responsibility.
Environmental and Resource Economics 44: 495-506. 2009.
Baek NG. The effect of ESG management on authenticity, reputation: focused on food product purchasing experience.
The Academy of Customer Satisfaction Management 24: 25-47. 2022.
Cho M, Ko EB, Kim JH, Lee JM. Effect of customized cosmetics selection attributes and safety perception on intention to purchase.
Asian Journal of Beauty and Cosmetology 19: 513-524. 2021.
Choi PH, Jun JK. The effects of airlines’s creating shared value(CSV) on brand trust, brand attitude, and brand loyalty.
Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 31: 191-207. 2022.
Grădinaru C, Obadă DR, Grădinaru IA, Dabija DC. Enhancing sustainable cosmetics brand purchase: a comprehensive approach based on the sor model and the triple bottom line. Sustainability 14: 1-22. 2022.
Hair JF, Hult GT, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. USA. pp135-140. 2017.
Hamid MR Ab, Sami W, Sidek MH. Discriminant validity assessment: use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 890: 1-5. 2017.
Han SH, Youn YH. A study on factors affecting purchase intention of eco-friendly cosmetics: an integrated model of theory of consumption value and extended theory of planned behavior. Korean Management Consulting Review 22: 127-140. 2022.
Jang MA, Lee JM, Bae SH. A study of consumer choice behavior determination applying the theory of planned behavior (TPB) of functional cosmetics.
Asian Journal of Beauty and Cosmetology 20: 95-110. 2022.
Kim HH, Ku BCH, Kim JY, Park YJ, Park YB. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis for validating the phlegm pattern questionnaire for healthy subjects.
Evidence Based Complementary Alternative Medicine 2016: 2696019. 2016.
Kim MJ, Lee JY, Park JA. A study of cosmetics industry sustainable management: focused on the esg.
Journal of The Korean Society of cosmetology 28: 1232-1240. 2022.
Kim NM. “Green” versus “good-hearted” brand image: which image cosmetic consumers prefer?
Journal of Product Research 34: 127-135. 2016.
Kim YJ, Kim EJ, Kim JW. A study on the impact of CSV (creating shared value) of delivery companies on confidence and intention to use delivery service: focused on senior parcel delivery. Journal of the Korea Society Industrial Information System 22: 85-100. 2017.
Kline TJ. Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation. Sage publications. New York. pp60. 2005.
Koh HK, Burnasheva R, Suh YG. Perceived esg (environmental, social, governance) and consumers’ responses: the mediating role of brand credibility, brand image, and perceived quality.
Sustainability 14: 1-15. 2022.
Lee MH, Kim MY. A study on consumer perception and attitudes of lightweight cosmetics containers with eco-friendly convergence design method.
The Korean Society of Science & Art 39: 369-382. 2021.
Lee SJ. The effect of k-beauty brand’s environmental CSR on loyalty through eco-friendly image and symbolic value: focused on the comparison of Korean and Chinese consumers. Journal of Beauty Art Management 16: 131-150. 2022.
Lim SY, Kwon KH. Effects on oil/moisture changes using commercial brand cosmetics versus DIY cosmetics in women in their 20s and 30s with dry skin.
Asian Journal of Beauty and Cosmetology 18: 365-373. 2020.
Lee WS, Jin MK. The effect of selection attributes on customer satisfaction and behavior intention in eco-friendly coffee shop: the moderating effect of involvement.
International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences 37: 165-182. 2022.
Oprean-Stan C, Ionica HO, Iuga IC, Stan SE. Impact of sustainability reporting and inadequate management of esg factors on corporate performance and sustainable growth.
Sustainability 12: 1-31. 2020.
Park HA, Lee IH. The influence of environmental values on ecofriendly cosmetics consumption behavior in generation mz. The Korean Society of Beauty and Art 23: 21-36. 2022.
Raajpoot N, Ghilni-Wage B. Impact of customer engagement, brand attitude and brand experience on branded apps recommendation and re-use intentions. Atlantic Marketing Journal 8: 1-17. 2019.
Seo YJ, Han JS. A study on the effect of brand identification of eco-friendly hotel guests on brand loyalty: moderating effect of environmental involvement.
Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research 32: 145-163. 2020.
Song JA, Jang SH. An identification of determinants to ambivalent purchase intention of fashion luxury brand expanded cosmetic for MZ generation. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association 21: 47-67. 2021.
Syed AM. Environment, social and governance (ESG) criteria and preference of managers.
Cognent Business & Management 4: 1-13. 2017.
Wang K, Lee HY. The effects of customers consciousness about the environment and the environmental agricultural products on their trust, attitude and loyalty: focusing on the comparison between Korean and Chinese markets. Korean Journal of Food Marketing Economics 29: 1-28. 2012.
Widayat W, Praharjo A, Putri VP, Andharini SN, Masudin I. Responsible consumer behavior: driving factors of proenvironmental behavior toward post-consumption plastic packaging.
Sustainability 14: 1-19. 2022.
Zaichkowsky JL. Measuring the involvement construct.
Journal of Consumer Research 12: 341-352. 1985.
Živković S, Veljković M. The concept and objectives of environmental management.
Economics of Sustainable Development 4: 37-47. 2020.